this post is to express publicly my view as a christian about the eternal destiny of those who put their trust in God in the way that He requires, and about those who refuse to put their trust in God in the way that He requires.------------------------
i believe differently than what is commonly expressed is the standard christian understanding of the destinies of the believers and unbelievers.---------------------------------
i believe that believers will have a future with God that is good and holy and beautiful and fulfilling and eternal. i believe that those who refuse to do things God's way- refuse to relate to Him in the way He requires- will cease to exist when their bodies on this physical plane cease to live.--------------------------
i believe that when the Bible says "eternal fires" God is saying that the death of those that die is irrevocable- that they cannot subsequently be brought back to life. the two words the Bible uses for hell, gehenna and sheol, mean respectively, "the garbage dump in the valley of Gehenna outside of jerusalem" and "the grave" (and the garbage was traditionally burned, i believe. you need to check that out.)------------------------- i believe that the reason that "fiery" was used in descriptions of the destiny of the (too proud) unbelievers was that there were many instances in the Bible where people were resurrected- came back from death. this fire was to indicate that the state of those that "died outside of God" was irreversible. (of course, where does that leave the 3 strong believers in persia who were thrown into the fiery furnace by the king who didn't tolerate their putting God first. Jesus saved them. i'm going to say that that episode was of physical death and the miracle that Jesus made there was in the physical world. therefore that fiery episode does not relate to the destiny of too-proud unbelievers.)---------------------------the reason that i find it important to express myself on this now is that (i believe) people -both unbelievers and believers- cannot accept that a loving God would eternally torture anyone with fire or anything. it doesn't make sense. God is love. even if He rejects someone for rejecting Him, i just don't see Him as torturing that person. i feel that this belief is so contradictory that is makes people think that christianity is not valid.-------------------------the most recent thing that reinforced my belief about this was talking to a jewish man who is responsible for making sure that the kosher (and pareve, etc.) foods were prepared and maintained in the correct manner. he said that the kosher procedure for killing animals was the least painful and traumatic death that could be given to an animal that was killed by a person. that made me think "if God is that concerned about reducing the pain that an animal had to endure to the least possible, wouldn't He do the same for people- even if they were people who had rejected Him?"----------------------------i have more to say on this; but it will have to wait. in the meantime, you can look of the writings of mr.sherman noble who was or is member of Theologica.ning.com and wrote about his beliefs on this there and other places. ------------------------------i don't agree with mr. nobles on everything, but he has researched arguments about this question.